<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>c0t0d0s0.org - Aviation</title>
    <link>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/</link>
    <description>the sun in a lighthungry universe</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Low flying</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/469914047/5064-Low-flying.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-Low-flying.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5064</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5064</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/vowe.net/archives/010098.html');"  href="http://vowe.net/archives/010098.html">Vowe</a> got me at my two weak points with linking to this video: aircrafts and good music. I can look at such videos for hours:<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NadyirHsGmw&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NadyirHsGmw&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
PS: Perhaps i should  really thinking about learning to fly. I´m asked about that by colleagues, friends and readers in quite a regular manner. But at the moment i´m glad that i´ve lost my fear of flying. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/469914047" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:51:40 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5064-Low-flying.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>747-8 delayed</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/466038619/5058-747-8-delayed.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-747-8-delayed.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5058</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5058</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The delays at the 787 program hide a little bit the delays at another important programm of Boeing. The regenerated 747 will be delayed, too <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/11/25/319059/747-8-schedule-undone-by-787-crisis-management-errors.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/11/25/319059/747-8-schedule-undone-by-787-crisis-management-errors.html">747-8 schedule undone by 787 crisis, management errors </a>. Stephen Trimble writes in his article:<blockquote>Boeing shifted the delivery date for the 747-8 Freighter to Cargolux from late 2009 to the third quarter of 2010. First delivery of the 747-8 Intercontinental, a passenger variant struggling to attract orders, dropped from late 2010 to the second quarter of 2011.</blockquote>and<blockquote>The flight-test phase is now allotted between seven and nine months to complete, Teal says. By comparison, Boeing completed the flight-test programme for the 777-200LR, a perhaps less ambitious derivative programme, in about 10 months in 2005.</blockquote>At just 20 (+8 for Boeing Business Jet as a customer) orders for the 747-8 but 78 for the freighter i wouldn´t be suprised a lot if see more delays for the passenger variant to help the 747-8F. It´s like in computer engineering ... given a fixed number of engineering cyles you have to find an economical sensible distribution. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/466038619" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:25:09 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5058-747-8-delayed.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Faulty parts on all Boeing jets</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/466038620/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5057</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5057</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The problem with faulty (without anticorrosion plating) nutplates just got bigger. James Wallace writes in "<a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/155438.asp?source=rss');"  href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/155438.asp?source=rss">Faulty parts on all Boeing jets</a>":<blockquote>Those nonconforming nutplates that I wrote about a couple of weeks ago are on all Boeing jets, not just the 737. But there are far fewer on the 747, 777 and 767 than are on the 737. Still, Boeing said Tuesday that they must all be found and replaced before any more planes are delivered.</blockquote>I assume, those faulty nutplates are in already delivered aircrafts, too. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/466038620" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:00:56 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5057-Faulty-parts-on-all-Boeing-jets.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>787 Dreamliner production frozen as fastener issue paces program</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/464066547/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5049</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5049</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The flight blogger published an really interesting article, again - <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/787-dreamliner-production-froz.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/787-dreamliner-production-froz.html">787 Dreamliner production frozen as fastener issue paces program</a><br />
<br />
At first it looks like there is finally a number of fasteners awaiting their substitution.<blockquote>The Seattle Times, citing sources familiar with the situation, reports that 2000 fasteners will need to be replaced on the aft fuselage and 3000 for the forward fuselage produced by Spirit Aerosystems.</blockquote>Furthermore they had to disassemble the Dreamline One again. They had to remove more than just the engines:<blockquote>Dreamliners One through Four have had their engine pylons removed and returned to Spirit AeroSystems for fastener repairs. As a result, the Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines from Dreamliner One have been removed and positioned behind the aircraft.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/464066547" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5049-787-Dreamliner-production-frozen-as-fastener-issue-paces-program.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Airbus says Boeing strike was big help</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/463813869/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5047</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5047</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <p><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/388976_airbus22.html?source=rss');"  href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/388976_airbus22.html?source=rss">Airbus says Boeing strike was big help</a>:<blockquote> "PARIS -- Airbus benefited from the recent strike by workers at The Boeing Co. as it gave stretched suppliers more time to focus on orders from the European jet maker, the company said Friday."</blockquote>I assume the people at Boeing bite their back at the moment. The strike did not only postponed the delivery of all airplanes at Boeing. They even helped their biggest competitor. <br />
<br />
I assume the ongoing delays in the 787 Delayliner, 747-8 and 777F programs will help Airbus, too. Some suppliers stopped already the manufacturing for Boeing for some time. More time for them to work for Airbus. At the end many parts of an aircraft (either Boeing or Airbus) are from the same manufacturers. BTW: This is the the same reason, why "Buy american" or "Buy european" is nonsense. Building aircraft got an global business a long time ago ...<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/463813869" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:04:53 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5047-Airbus-says-Boeing-strike-was-big-help.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>787 wing break test</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/458859868/5031-787-wing-break-test.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-787-wing-break-test.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5031</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5031</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Boeing was successful at breaking a part of a 787. Successful means: It broke at more than the oneandahalf-fold ever-expected maximum aerodynamic load. Anyway .... there is a <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/787milestones.tpninteractive.com/');"  href="http://787milestones.tpninteractive.com/">video</a> of the test and looking at engineers breaking huge things with huge tools is really cool ... <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> Dear Boeing ... now do this with a full wing ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/458859868" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:54:59 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5031-787-wing-break-test.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>People from Switzerland are strange</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/455930689/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5024</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5024</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Or to be exact: At least their sense of humor in regard of their airline. The Map application in the Swiss A340-300 is really interesting. They show some POI in their map. I remember at least: <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_(SSN-593)');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_(SSN-593)">Thresher</a>, Titanic, <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Empress_of_Ireland');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Empress_of_Ireland">Empress of Ireland</a> and the <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Gustloff_(ship)');"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Gustloff_(ship)">Wilhelm Gustloff</a>. Those points mark big disasters in maritime history.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/455930689" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:07:15 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5024-People-from-Switzerland-are-strange.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>When it rains, it pours ...</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/452153500/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=5013</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5013</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, the bad messages from Boeing doesn't end: The flight blogger reports , that Boeing has to replace <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/nonconformance-of-structural-c.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/11/nonconformance-of-structural-c.html">of nut plates because of non-conformance to specification</a>, as they used ones without an anti-corrosive coating. Mechanics have to remove thousands of plates and place new ones per aircraft.<br />
<br />
To add insult to injury, it's likely that several already flying planes have the same non-conforming plates:<blockquote>According to Boeing, 737s delivered to customers since August 2007 contained non-conforming nutplates. Boeing's delivery website says that 394 737s were delivered between August 2007 and October 2008.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/452153500" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:20 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5013-When-it-rains,-it-pours-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Yet another 787 delay</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/443346884/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4988</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4988</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, this starts to get ridiclious. Boeing announced another delay in the 787 program according to <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/153379.asp?source=rss');"  href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/153379.asp?source=rss">this article</a>. The first flight is rescheduled to next year and they didn´t announced a new date. The delivery of the first aircrafts in 2009 look impossible for me.<br />
<br />
While everybody expected that the IAM strike would have some impact to the schedule, there is another reason: Wrong installation of fasteners. According to Boeing 3% of all fasteners were incorrectly installed.<blockquote>An estimated 3 percent of the fasteners on four flight-test planes at the Everett plant, plus two others that have been assembled for ground testing, were installed incorrectly and will have to be removed and replaced.</blockquote>At a count of several hundred-thousands fasteners per aircraft, 3% is a lot of work.  Another <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122584370340899223-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA1NDgwNDQzWj.html');"  href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122584370340899223-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA1NDgwNDQzWj.html">article</a> at the Wall Street Journal writes: <blockquote>Engineers have traced it to improper instructions on what type and length of fasteners to use on certain titanium parts. The fasteners, located throughout the airplane, were installed mostly by suppliers at the plants where the major sections of the jet are being built, and affect all fuselage sections built so far</blockquote>.I start to get some doubts about entering a 787 when it will entering service in the future. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/443346884" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:37:32 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<category>boeing</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4988-Yet-another-787-delay.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>LRBL</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/439502391/4976-LRBL.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-LRBL.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4976</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4976</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is a new requirement from the FAA. Any airplane <a href="FAA issues final rule to increase airliner explosives survivability">certified after the 28 November has to have a desginated LRBL</a>. It´s one of this security theater things from my point of view. A LRBL is a "least risk bomb location", a location where a bomb explosion would inflict the least damage to the aircraft.  I see some problems in such a location. <br />
<br />
You have to move the bomb to get it to the LRBL. At first you have to find someone who is brave enough to move around an live explosive device. As we know of several hollywood movies  ( <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> ) an explosive device would have an trap fuse, that would  trigger the the explosion in the event of moving it around. You should at least keep the existence secret and hidden in the aircrafts operation manual to prevent the addition of such trap fuses to terrorists bombs or the usage of an more potent explosive substance. <br />
<br />
At the end: It´s the classic ammunition/armour competition. There is always one winner and it´s always the same competitor: The ammunition.The only way to increase the airliner explosive survivability is to keep of the explosives offboard. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/439502391" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:56:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-guid.html</guid>
    <category>aviation</category>
<category>security</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4976-LRBL.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Pedantic nation</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/433996309/4964-Pedantic-nation.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-Pedantic-nation.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4964</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4964</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    I had my trip back to Hamburg from Toulouse today. Was a nice flight. Well, except the contact with the ground crew in Toulouse. I had the impertinence to try to board while the boarding of rows 12 to 25 took place. The look from the lady was able to kill mere mortals. She didn´t allowed me to board the plane. Okay ... waiting 30 seconds. She announced the immediate boarding of all rows. Now i was allowed to enter the aircraft.  Dammed! French people are really pedantic for a nation with a revolution in its history ... <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/433996309" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:55:02 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4964-Pedantic-nation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Nacktscanner</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/430741069/4955-Nacktscanner.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-Nacktscanner.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4955</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4955</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Hmmm ... die Diskussion, die dieser Tage durch die Medien getrieben wird, kommt mir seltsam bekannt vor: In <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/777-Maximal-invasive-Sicherheit.html">"Maximal invasive Sicherheit"</a> habe ich 2005 erstmals ueber Backscatter-Röntgen geschrieben. Ich muss mittlerweile sagen, das ich weniger Probleme mit der Technik habe, als damaligerzeit. Mittlerweile sind die Geräte soweit entwickelt, das sie den Körper aus dem Bild herausfiltern und somit nur noch Fremdkörper auf dem Bild zu sehen ist. Also nicht die "Kleine-Jungs"-Phantasie mit der durch Klamotten guckenden Brille. In den Flughaefen in den USA ist es uebrigens ueblich, das die Bilder nicht von den Leute geprueft werden, die auch die Menschen dazu sehen, sondern diese in einem getrennten, entfernten Raum gescreened werden. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/430741069" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:53:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4955-Nacktscanner.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Airtraffic over Europe</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/406506483/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4881</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4881</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    An impressive video, that shows the traffic over the european continent. Some of the race tracks above germany are really obvious ... for example the one between Northern Germany and Frankfurt.<br />
<br />
<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cQTAfIf_AOk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cQTAfIf_AOk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/406506483" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:52:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4881-Airtraffic-over-Europe.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Really small steps</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/405641837/4871-Really-small-steps.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-Really-small-steps.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4871</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4871</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Perhaps it´s just me, but i think there must be really big problems in the 787 program, when Boeing celebrates such small steps as a <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/boeing-completes-787-highblow.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/boeing-completes-787-highblow.html">successful static pressure test</a>. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/405641837" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:31:39 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4871-Really-small-steps.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>In the paintshop</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/399185263/4851-In-the-paintshop.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-In-the-paintshop.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4851</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4851</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/welP2InJc7A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/welP2InJc7A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/399185263" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:13:53 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-guid.html</guid>
    <category>a380</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4851-In-the-paintshop.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380 delivered to Quantas</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/399185264/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4850</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4850</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Quantas got its <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/09/21/1221935420594.html');"  href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/09/21/1221935420594.html">first A380</a> and arrived in Sydney:<blockquote>On board the delivery flight, Captain Peter Probert, whose father brought the first Boeing 747 into Australia in 1971, told passengers that the flight had been a career highlight</blockquote>In my opinion, the <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4492-Quantas-A380-MSN014-left-the-paint-shop.html">livery of the Quantas A380</a> is the most beautiful so far ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/399185264" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:09:26 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4850-A380-delivered-to-Quantas.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>More delays for the 787 program</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/384746929/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4793</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4793</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The problems in the 787 program doesn´t seem to end. The flightblogger reports about <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/ahead-of-a-potential-strike-bo.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/09/ahead-of-a-potential-strike-bo.html">further delays in the assembly of Delayliner, sorry ... Dreamliner One</a>:<blockquote>According to several sources inside the 787 program and others familiar with the schedule, assembly completion of Dreamliner One is now tentatively targeted for early October, a slip of about five weeks.<br />
<br />
Assembly completion was initially set for August 31, just four days prior to the expiration of the IAM's three-year contract.</blockquote>This retargeting was done before the union of the aircraft workers voted for a strike. I really start to think, that there won´t be any deliveries in 2009, really bad new for an aircraft that was initially planned to bring guests to the Olympic games in Beijing .... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/384746929" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:55:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4793-More-delays-for-the-787-program.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Interims report about the 777 crash at Heathrow</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/384746930/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4792</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4792</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    You may remember the crash at Heathrow, where an 777 landed short of the runway. The UKs Air Accidents Investigation Branch published an <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/sites/aaib/cms_resources/G-YMMM%20Interim%20Report.pdf');"  href="http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/sites/aaib/cms_resources/G-YMMM%20Interim%20Report.pdf">report</a> to document the actual state of the investigation. At the moment, they think that ice buildup in the fuel system took out both engines. This can happen as fuel contains a certain amount of water. But the ice buildup is a little bit strange, as the aircraft was operated within the certified operational envelope, thus the AAIB already recommended that the aircraft security authorities should look after this issue not only for the 777 with Trent engines, but for future certifications. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/384746930" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:42:30 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4792-Interims-report-about-the-777-crash-at-Heathrow.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Final approach ...</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/378466818/4776-Final-approach-....html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-Final-approach-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4776</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4776</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <center><a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flickr.com/photos/c0t0d0s0/2807771501/');"  href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/c0t0d0s0/2807771501/" title="Experimental von c0t0d0s0 bei Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3193/2807771501_c65dfbc726.jpg" width="400" alt="Experimental" border=0 /></a></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/378466818" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:58:39 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4776-Final-approach-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A380-900</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/377358561/4772-A380-900.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-A380-900.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4772</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4772</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    They don´t have their own A380 aircrafts but after Air France/KLM there is a second airline interested in a even bigger A380 as Mr. Gallois disclosed in <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aero.de/Gallois_Lufthansa_will_Airbus_A380-900_7118.htm');"  href="http://www.aero.de/Gallois_Lufthansa_will_Airbus_A380-900_7118.htm">a newspaper interview</a>. The german Lufthansa wants this plane, too. The A380-900 would be able to carry 963 passengers. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/377358561" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:06:43 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4772-A380-900.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>More news about the Spanair crash</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/375590173/4766-More-news-about-the-Spanair-crash.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4766-More-news-about-the-Spanair-crash.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4766</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4766</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Relatively short after the crash there were rumours about deployed thrust reversers at one of the engines of the Spanair aircraft and shortly after this you were able to find a <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flugzeugforum.de/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=361262&amp;amp;stc=1&amp;amp;d=1219340785');"  href="http://www.flugzeugforum.de/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=361262&amp;stc=1&amp;d=1219340785">photo (login needed)</a> of this engine at the usual discussion areas. Today two spanish newspaper reported according to <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=comm&amp;amp;id=news/SPAN08268.xml');"  href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=comm&amp;id=news/SPAN08268.xml">Aviationweek</a> and the german newssite <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/806/307757/text/');"  href="http://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/806/307757/text/">sueddeutsche.de (based on dpa)</a> that the thrust reverser of one engine were found in the deployed position.<br />
<br />
Albeit this would explain some of the reported reactions of the plane, it´s much to early to draw any conclusions. The question is now: Were the reversers in this position before the crash or were they moved in this position by the crash. We have to wait for the final accident report  ...<br />
<br />
PS: Nevertheless this  evoked memories to the  <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/publications/Incidents/DOCS/ComAndRep/LaudaAir/LaudaRPT.html');"  href="http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/publications/Incidents/DOCS/ComAndRep/LaudaAir/LaudaRPT.html">LaudaAir 004</a> crash in me: Mid-air deployment of the reversers in 24,700 feet. Nobody in the aircraft survived the crash. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/375590173" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:22:49 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4766-guid.html</guid>
    <category>aviation</category>
<category>spanair</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4766-More-news-about-the-Spanair-crash.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Jahresbericht 2007 der Bundestelle fuer Flugunfalluntersuchung</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/373029015/4751-Jahresbericht-2007-der-Bundestelle-fuer-Flugunfalluntersuchung.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4751-Jahresbericht-2007-der-Bundestelle-fuer-Flugunfalluntersuchung.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4751</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4751</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Wer sich dafür interessiert, was so im Dunstkreis der Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung so an Unfällen und Störungen passiert ist, kann sich mal den <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.bfu-web.de/cln_005/nn_223976/DE/Publikationen/Statistiken/Jahresberichte/BFU_20Jahresbericht_202007.html');"  href="http://www.bfu-web.de/cln_005/nn_223976/DE/Publikationen/Statistiken/Jahresberichte/BFU_20Jahresbericht_202007.html">Jahresbericht 2007</a> durchlesen. Ist aber vielleicht keine Lektüre für Leute mit Flugangst. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/373029015" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:51:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4751-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4751-Jahresbericht-2007-der-Bundestelle-fuer-Flugunfalluntersuchung.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Spanair crash</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/371891455/4745-Spanair-crash.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4745-Spanair-crash.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4745</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4745</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Journalists, especially those working for TV news programs are a little bit weird. Every few days they repeat Discovery Channel documentations about aircraft crash analysis (UA811, TWA800, El-Al Flight 1862, Swiss-Air 111)  here in Germany - for example N24 - about the difficult and problematic post crash analysis. Sometime it takes years to find the real reason of an aircraft crash. Nevertheless journalists bash Spanair for giving no further informations about the causes for the crash. They should know better, at least when they look they own news programm. Nobody can tell more than 	speculative assumptions after just 2 days. <br />
<br />
The bad thing: In an interview, a woman blamed Spanair for giving her less informations than the news. The problem: The news in the news are just rumours.<br />
<br />
And then the Air Accident report will give an exact answer to the crash cause in a few months, no TV programm will report about it. Well, they will report about it, if Discovery Channel makes a documentation about it ... telling how hard it was to find the reason ... again ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/371891455" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:26:52 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4745-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4745-Spanair-crash.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Interesting development at the USAF tanker proposal</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/418340399/4703-Interesting-development-at-the-USAF-tanker-proposal.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4703-Interesting-development-at-the-USAF-tanker-proposal.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4703</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4703</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    According to a report at <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BOEING081108.xml&amp;amp;headline=Boeing%20Leaning%20Toward%20Not%20Re-bidding%20KC-X&amp;amp;channel=defense');"  href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BOEING081108.xml&amp;headline=Boeing%20Leaning%20Toward%20Not%20Re-bidding%20KC-X&amp;channel=defense">Aviationweek</a> Boeing thinks about to leave the tanker rebidding process. The new proposal gives more credits to a bigger tanker and thus a 767 based tanker wouldn´t be competitive to a A330 based tanker ... and as i wrote before. A 777 based tanker is no alternative for Boeing besides of the short timeframe for this proposal.<blockquote>Now, however, the Pentagon is pushing for the replacement tankers as soon as possible after multiple delays. It remains unclear if a no-bid position from Boeing would drag out the KC-X competition or it if would compel the Pentagon to attempt a sole-source of the work to Northrop Grumman/EADS.</blockquote>This is an interesting development. Stopping the former decision with the help of the GOA just do leave the proposal process afterwards will not help to make friends for future proposals .... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/418340399" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:16:44 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4703-guid.html</guid>
    <category>airbus</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<category>boeing</category>
<category>general</category>
<category>usaf</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4703-Interesting-development-at-the-USAF-tanker-proposal.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>More 787 delays imminent?</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/337068749/4633-More-787-delays-imminent.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4633-More-787-delays-imminent.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4633</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4633</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The last three delays for the 787 were related to supply chain problems, now Boeing told the press that there are certification problems with the brake monitoring software as RedOrbit reports in: <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1479487/boeing_787_dreamliner_experiences_another_delay/');"  href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1479487/boeing_787_dreamliner_experiences_another_delay/">Boeing 787 Dreamliner Experiences Another Delay</a>:<blockquote>Shanahan, who has led the 787 program since October last year, said the latest hitch has been delays in getting the software in the 787's brake control system verified to meet stringent certification requirements. [...|"It's not that the brakes don't work, it's the traceability of the software," Shanahan said[...]He said that Crane had to go back and rewrite certain parts of the brake control software to verify it for the certification process.</blockquote>My sources in the airline industry told me that the certification is the hardest part at building a plane and thus problem can haunt you for a while when you are not really cautious. In addition to that the damages part of the Dreamliner Four introduce further timing problems, as they have to rebuild that section completly.<br />
<br />
Well, i hope that Boeing is able to get rid of the problem. Another delay doesn´t really sound as beneficial  for the company. They already sold near of a thousand airplanes and only a million dollars of additional contract fines per plane would cost them $1bn now. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/337068749" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:06:46 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4633-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4633-More-787-delays-imminent.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Nachteil eines etwas selteneren Nachnamens ....</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/335376536/4627-Nachteil-eines-etwas-selteneren-Nachnamens-.....html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4627-Nachteil-eines-etwas-selteneren-Nachnamens-.....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4627</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4627</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Ist ja echt schade, das mein Nachname etwas seltener ist ... sonst wuerde mir <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/martin13088.blog.de/2008/06/28/duschgel-im-plastikbeutel-mit-dem-auswei-4374313');"  href="http://martin13088.blog.de/2008/06/28/duschgel-im-plastikbeutel-mit-dem-auswei-4374313">die Air Berlin vielleicht auch die Bordkarten für interessante Ziele anderer  Leute anbieten ...</a>. Immer nur nach München mit AB zu fliegen ist auf die Dauer doch langweilig <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/335376536" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:34:30 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4627-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4627-Nachteil-eines-etwas-selteneren-Nachnamens-.....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>News from the tanker deal</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/333008664/4615-News-from-the-tanker-deal.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4615-News-from-the-tanker-deal.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4615</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4615</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Well, Northop lost the deal after the GAO ruling, there will be an new Request for Proposals ... but  i really think that Boeing won´t get the deal in the next attempt either when there is no further political counterfire. <br />
<br />
The problem is somewhat bigger: Let´s assume Boeing has enough time to build a tanker on the foundation of the 777 airframe to get a bigger aircraft. They have another problem: They do not have the capacities to build it. The 777 is a successful plane and in addition to that they sell this planes as an interims solution for airlines with an urgent need for aircrafts since the 787 is vastly delayed at the moment. The USAF would be a customer like anyone else and do not believe Boeing can explain to their commercial customers that the next 150 airframes are reserved for the USAF ... which in turn would be nice for Airbus: More A330/A340 to sell. And they can´t put the tanker 777 at the end of the line. At several locations in the net you can read that they need a replacement for their old tankers really soon.<br />
<br />
The solution with the 767 wouldn´t have this problem. It´s an EOLed planed for commercial customers and thus they have the capacities to produce it in the old assembly lines. So the point "the airforce wants a bigger tanker" is a real problem to Boeing. They are dependent to the old requirements in the request for an proposal. And in some news outlets in the US you can already see the lobbying against a modification of the  requirements in favour of an bigger plane.<br />
<br />
I think, the end of this year will really interesting for both companies. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/333008664" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4615-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4615-News-from-the-tanker-deal.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>747 crashes at start</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/329605767/4599-747-crashes-at-start.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4599-747-crashes-at-start.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4599</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4599</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    On May 25th <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4445-747-breaks-at-start.html">a 747 of Kalitta Air breaked</a> in parts after a rejected take off after shooting over the end of the runway. It looks like Kalitta Air has a strain of bad luck at the moment: CNN reported that another 747 crashed into a house near Bogota: <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/07/07/colombia.crash.ap/?iref=mpstoryview');"  href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/07/07/colombia.crash.ap/?iref=mpstoryview">747 freighter crashes in Colombia</a>. The second crash of a Kalitta aircraft in 6 weeks.  According to other news services it was the N714CK, a converted 747-200. This aircraft was delivered in 1981, thus it was 29 years old. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/329605767" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:09:09 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4599-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4599-747-crashes-at-start.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>787 problems</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/326505881/4575-787-problems.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4575-787-problems.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4575</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4575</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    I don´t think, that i will fly with the 787 anytime soon ... even in case, this baby will fly next year. There are new delays in the programs. As far <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/06/exclusive-boeing-delays-dreaml.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/06/exclusive-boeing-delays-dreaml.html">as the usual suspects report</a>, a mechanic at Alenia was able to destroy a complete barrel of the fuselage by using wrong fasteners. The damage was so severe, that they wait for a new center fuselage barrel.<br />
<br />
Okay, this can happen, but this rises some questions for me as an outsider to this business : How do Boeing expect that an ordinary flight mechanic can repair the 787 on the apron, when a catering truck bumps into the plane or an uncautious loader rams its vehicle into lower deck? When even the people at the factory are unable to repair a damage? And to think it the other way round: Will they throw away such fuselage parts in the future or will they repair this to save some money (Boeing is a public traded company and i think Fight Club was right with it´s presentation of the internal logic of companies). The damage must have been severe enough that Boeing examines it complete schedule as Dreamliner Four plays an important role in the flight test schedule. And this just by the mistake of a single mechanic.<br />
<br />
Additionally: This damage happpened at a part of the plane that was problematic for Boeing in the past as reported for example at <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.designnews.com/article/CA6543814.html');"  href="http://www.designnews.com/article/CA6543814.html">Design News: Boeing Stiffens 787 Wing Box Spars: More Schedule Delays Possible</a>. <br />
<br />
Some strange: AirportBusiness.com reports in <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.airportbusiness.com/online/article.jsp?siteSection=1&amp;amp;id=20938');"  href="http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/article.jsp?siteSection=1&amp;id=20938">"787 partner halts work briefly after FAA audit"</a>:<blockquote>The South Carolina plant that assembles the mid-fuselage of Boeing's 787 Dreamliner halted production for 24 hours beginning Monday night after a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) audit found lax manufacturing procedures that could result in damage to the aircraft sections.<br />
[...]<br />
He said it wasn't surprising the FAA found issues, given the high number of workers there who "never worked on airplanes before.<br />
[...]<br />
"In the beginning ... they were basically looking the other way to get the plane built," said the contractor. "Now people are paying attention to procedures and everything is being done by the letter of the law."</blockquote>Sorry that i can´t resist ... but: The test flight pilots should wear parachutes not only on first flight <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /><br />
<br />
Well, i´m not in the aircraft business and i´m just a interested outsider , but at the moment my confidence as an upcoming  consumer in this aircraft is waning at best ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/326505881" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:57:44 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4575-guid.html</guid>
    <category>787</category>
<category>aviation</category>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4575-787-problems.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A good compromise for the USAF tanker dispute?</title>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~3/317545347/4539-A-good-compromise-for-the-USAF-tanker-dispute.html</link>
            <category>Aviation</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4539-A-good-compromise-for-the-USAF-tanker-dispute.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=4539</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4539</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay, most times a good compromise is a good thing, but Thomas Cook goes a tad too far <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> ...<br />
<br />
<center><!-- s9ymdb:483 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="400" height="322" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/a767.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt=""  /><br />
<small>(via: <a onclick="javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/extlink/www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flight-international/2008/06/tour-operator-cooks-up-a-new-j.html');"  href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flight-international/2008/06/tour-operator-cooks-up-a-new-j.html">Flight International</a>)</small></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Aviation/~4/317545347" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:23:52 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4539-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/4539-A-good-compromise-for-the-USAF-tanker-dispute.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>
